{"id":869,"date":"2016-05-31T12:05:39","date_gmt":"2016-05-31T16:05:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/?p=869"},"modified":"2016-05-31T12:05:39","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T16:05:39","slug":"big-three-bailout","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/2016\/05\/31\/big-three-bailout\/","title":{"rendered":"Big Three Bailout"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Big Three. The automakers who installed Wi-Fi in their cars and invented luxurious heated seats. General Motors (GM), Ford Motor Company, and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) produce more than \u2154 of all cars sold in the whole world. So, as you can imagine, if these automakers stop producing cars, problems will start to form faster than they can be resolved.<\/p>\n<p>In 2008, two of the Big Three US automakers \u2013 General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles \u2013 declared their bankruptcy. To prevent millions of job losses and immense damage to the manufacturing sector, the US and Canadian governments provided $85 million of financial support to GM and FCA in 2009.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Big Three are the only American car manufacturers. They employ a large number of people, who in turn, support the economy with their spending power,\u201d says Ahmed Bazzari, a quality engineer at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. \u201cAllowing the Big Three to fail would have a serious impact on the US economy. The bailout was a \u2018crutch\u2019 that allowed FCA and GM to continue to function until they could heal themselves again.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>GM and Chrysler went bankrupt because of low auto sales. According to <a href=\"https:\/\/useconomy.about.com\/od\/criticalssues\/a\/auto_bailout.htm\">https:\/\/useconomy.about.com\/od\/criticalssues\/a\/auto_bailout.htm<\/a>, \u201cBy December 2008, auto sales were 37% lower than a year earlier. This was 400,000 fewer vehicles, or the equivalent of two factories\u2019 annual output. GM and Chrysler had the worst decline, while Ford\u2019s loss was about the same as industry leaders Honda and Toyota.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Jehad Zughyer, a design release engineer\/product engineer who works at GM, states \u201cThere are many reasons GM and Chrysler fell into bankruptcy. Legacy costs, victim to their large <a href=\"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-872\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-872 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"big-3\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" srcset=\"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3-300x199.jpg 300w, https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3-280x186.jpg 280w, https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3-660x439.jpg 660w, https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/929\/2016\/05\/big-3.jpg 1080w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>size, bad management and tough union contracts.\u201d Zughyer adds, \u201cAnd most importantly is that\u00a0the Big Three in general have not been delivering the product that the American consumer is expecting in terms of design and quality. Other competitors such as the Japanese were able to deliver these products, and thus were able to take away from the Big Three market share.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This bailout allowed these two American automakers a second chance to restructure through tough times. The financial aid provided by the US government for General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles had both a negative and a positive impact on their operating procedures.<\/p>\n<p>Gregory Bourgoin, a supplier quality engineer at GM who formerly worked at FCA elaborates. \u201cA lot of people now think that GM and FCA are weak companies because it took the government to rescue them. Future sales were also negatively impacted.\u201d He adds, \u201cMany people thought that these companies should not survive because of management incompetence and too much capacity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, there were also positive impacts of this bailout as well. \u201cThe bailout forced each company to rethink future operating strategies and understand market conditions better.\u201d Bourgoin says. General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles became better companies after this bailout.<\/p>\n<p>The bailout that took place in 2009 affected GM and FCA negatively and positively. The Big Three would have never existed with the same size and success as they do today if they didn\u2019t experience bankruptcy and mend their errors for future references. All in all, the bailout created better companies than the ones who went bankrupt.<\/p>\n<p>Mariam Odeh<\/p>\n<p>Unis Middle School Journalist<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Big Three. The automakers who installed Wi-Fi in their cars and invented luxurious heated seats. General Motors (GM), Ford Motor Company, and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) produce more than \u2154 of all cars sold in the whole world. So, as you can imagine, if these automakers stop producing cars, problems will start to form &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/2016\/05\/31\/big-three-bailout\/\" class=\"more-link\">More <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":749,"featured_media":870,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-class-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/749"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/869\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iblog.dearbornschools.org\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}